Trump fantasized about pointing gun barrels in Liz Cheney's face

But we can't call his base garbage, weak, or unintelligent

I am shaking pissed over this one.

Trump and his enabling-asshole-garbage-adjacent supporters are currently trying to spin Trump’s latest piece of dangerous rhetoric after he mused during a Tucker Carlson interview about loaded guns being pointed in Liz Cheney’s face.

I shit you not and I quote:

“She’s a radical war hawk," Trump said. "Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay, let’s see how she feels about it. You know when the guns are trained on her face — you know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building." - Rawstory

This is ten times worse than Mark Cuban saying Trump surrounds himself with unintelligent Bimbos (my reenactment), but what Cuban said was true to an extent.

There are some sharp women in Donald’s camp using their intelligence against women in America for a buck—but Cuban didn’t stutter when he said that Trump is afraid of strong, independent women.

He. Was. Right!

Don’t walk it back, Mark!!!

Alina Habba herself said that she’s rather pretty than smart. If Habba truly is smart (and man, is she hiding it well if she is), the MAGA base applauded this statement.

I am sure some MAGA women smiled and nodded along.

Indeed, MAGA women themselves seem a-okay with their party’s assessment of ladies being pretty eye-candy who need to be seen, knocked up, and not heard. Just sex me up, baby, and get the hell out!

'Guy looks just like Rachel Maddow': MTG reacts to Mark Cuban 'intelligent women' quip

https://x.com/PortlazLuv/status/1852350474789454084

Now, don’t get me wrong—I like to doll up mahself on occasion, and, as a bisexual woman, I enjoy beauty in all things, including fellow humans—but that does not define me, nor would I desire to put someone in a “beauty bubble.”

I would value, and hope the people in my life would value, the parts of me that can withstand gravity and time.

Hell, MAGA ladies are even allowing the Charlie Kirk’s of the world to scold them and tell them to vote for Trump “or else…”

Seriously, when I reflect on Melania, Habba, Loomer, Green, Noam, Luna, Boobert, Lara, et al, I am not exactly thinking of Emmy Noether.

These self-same women, mind you, will go to the ends of the earth to defend Trump’s recent violent imagery against a female political opponent.

Defend it.

Even after a young MAGA bro showed up with a machete to a Florida polling place and threatened women—even after an older MAGA man violently harassed Black female poll workers just doing their jobs.

Hummm—don’t know about you but that sounds like trashy, not very intelligent behavior to me.

They can miss me entirely with all their mess.

As per Rawstory:

The former president appeared onstage Thursday night in Glendale, Arizona, for an interview with right-wing media personality Tucker Carlson, where he insulted president Joe Biden and vice president Kamala Harris and mused at length about Cheney, one of his most prominent Republican critics, having guns pointed at her.

…

While other panelists on "CNN This Morning" said there was no defending Trump's violent rhetoric, GOP strategist Brad Todd gave it a try.

"I'm going to say this in the backwards order so I can get it all out," Todd said. "I don't think that all first of all, I agree with Liz Cheney on foreign policy more than I agree with Donald Trump on some of these questions, or at least historically I have. He was talking about their difference on foreign policy. Liz Cheney is a hawk. If you listen to the rest of the [soundbite] he says she always wanted to go to war with people, I don't want to go to war with people. He was saying if she was the one that had to go into infantry combat maybe she would see it differently. That's a critique Democrats have made about Dick Cheney and other hawks."

Now, that is one hell of a spin. I have been critical of Liz and her father, Dick—not once did I fantasize about either of them being massacred by firing squad.

That shit is disgusting, and if you can defend it, guess what—you are garbage—full stop!

Sycophantic Trump Surrogate then went on to lie his ass off and claim Trump is winning bigly—

This is why he's in a close race. He's ahead in every target state this morning, enough to get to 270. In the New York Times poll, which is not exactly a friendly poll to him, saying things like this in this way, he'd be ahead by six or seven [points] if he didn't do that, if he was talking about the economy this week, if he was talking about crime and the border and things that this administration has failed on. I mean, yes, he does not choose his words very well. No, he is not on message, but he's about to win. He's about to win it, despite the way he talks. That tells you how unpopular this administration is."

Nope and nope.

Watch the video below to get the real skinny on how the data is looking for Trump, and it ain’t good:

Cheney responded to the barely veiled threat with class and dignity. Not a fan of Liz, but I applaud her:

“This is how dictators destroy free nations. They threaten those who speak against them with death. We cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man who wants to be a tyrant,” Cheney wrote on X with the hashtags #Womenwillnotbesilenced and #VoteKamala.

Now, can you just guess how MAGA would react if a suggestion of violence were lobbed at Trump?

All I can say is the Blue Tsunami cannot happen fast enough!